[Gpdd] MISC: Role of cavies in other cultures
Willowstorm25 at aol.com
Willowstorm25 at aol.com
Mon Mar 19 09:59:51 EDT 2007
Hi Slaves,
As I predicted, I have gotten a few emails from people who were offended by
my original post about South American cuy consumption, and there were a few
points I wanted to clarify before the lynch mob is assembled?
You make valid points here. It would offend me to see other exotic animals
slaughtered for meat. I believe it is against the law, anyway, but that is
beside the point. And, yes, it bothers me that people eat guinea pigs,
especially since, as one of you affirmed, cuy is no longer necessary for Latinos
to survive in the U.S.. That is also true. But unfortunatley, there are
many things that I find offensive that there is nothing I can really do about
except not participate. I will not even deign to list them all!
And yes, it does bother me to think of guinea pigs being consumed by
Latinos, but I am sincerely at a loss as to what I can do about it. Unfortunately
many people are very thin-skinned, and we are a litigious society. As a
teacher, I am held up to close scrutiny by administrators and students alike, and
I do often wonder about how I can "educate" my students about something like
that without being accused of being discriminatory and losing my job. This
may sound petty, but in New Jersey, where I live, things like this happen on a
regular basis, and for far lesser reasons.
Aside of that, I cannot fathom what I can do feasibly to stop cuy
consumption once people close the doors to their homes and come in for dinner. I have
never considered it my place, NOT becasue I don't care, but because I realize
most other people don't care, and that they are going do do what they are
going to do regardless of what I tell them. I make it clear to all my students
that guinea pigs are kept solely as pets in the U.S., but realistically, I
don't see what else there is that I can do.
Totally different topic, but a point for example: I have worked in inner
city school districts, and spent much time incorporating into my lessons the
dangers of joining gangs and the opportunities available to people now who live
in poverty. I am in a position to lecture because *I grew up in poverty
myself and escaped a gang* Even though these kids all know this, they couldn't
care less. They walk out of that school yard at 3:00 and beat the living
daylights out of the kid wearing red and go hold up that convenience store 15
minutes after my lesson ends. Some kids have gone home and told parents that
other teachers and I were "picking on them" and "belittling their culture."
And we have been reprimanded by bleeding-heart, spineless administrations. So
bottom line, most people don't listen. They do what they are going to do,
whether I like it or not. If what we say (be it about guinea pigs, gangs or
otherwise) does not fit with people's narrow view of the world, people either
throw it out or twist it around and throw it back our faces. This is human
nature. I don't consider myself particularly politically correct or a
"people pleaser," but there are precautions I take because I know I must in the
interest of preserving my livelihood. So, how can we (teachers, at least)
remedy this? Especially in a thin-skinned, sue-happy culture like that of New
Jersey? I would love any suggestions you have for me.
I love guinea pigs and do everything in my power to educate people about
them and make a better world for them.....
But the fact of the matter is that if *everyone* went around trying to
elimiate *everything* that offended them or that they disagreed with, and got
their way, then sooner or later we all would lose their freedoms to do anything,
and there would be really no rhyme or reason to any of it, because no matter
what one does, regardless of how innocuous it seems (and I DON'T consider the
killing of guinea pigs to be innocuous), there is always someone who is
going to find it offensive. And I think you and I both can think of at least a
dozen exaples of this off the top of our heads of that that have nothing to do
with animals. Mind you, blowing up a building because you don't agree with
someone's religion is blatantly wrong and needs to be punished. Sewing women
shut to keep them "pure" is wrong. Beating a kid (or a wife, or a husband)
is wrong. Those things are considered wrong and reprehensible on a national
scale, and they should be.
But there are also *so many* things that are considered gray and
controversial, and I'm *not* making light of them. But how do we go about putting an
end to all of those things without setting harmful precedents? Almost all
dictatorships started that way, and that is the point I am hoping to make. Even
though I don't like it, I realize that sometimes we just have to focus on the
big picture and how *all* the parts fit together, offensive or not. You
don't *have* to agree with me, but I hope you will at least hear where I am
coming from.
~Agreeing to disagree, Nicholle~
(though I will not speak for Ryvvir & Aquinnah on this one)
************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone.
Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.
More information about the Gpdd
mailing list